Noema’s exploration of Silvio Gesell’s demurrage currency concept—money that loses value over time unless circulated—challenges fundamental assumptions about wealth accumulation and monetary systems. The essay examines how currency design choices shape economic behavior, showing that money’s current form enabling indefinite accumulation and passive return through interest represents political choice rather than natural law. Demurrage currency inverts these assumptions: rather than rewarding hoarding, the system incentivizes circulation and productive use. The piece connects historical experiments with contemporary possibilities including digital currencies, showing how alternative monetary designs could reduce inequality, discourage speculation, and align economic incentives with community wellbeing rather than individual wealth maximization.
Key Highlights
-
Money as Designed System: The essay positions currency as political choice embodied in technical design rather than neutral medium, showing how monetary mechanisms shape power distribution and economic behavior.
-
Demurrage Mechanics: Noema explains how Gesell’s system works—money losing fixed percentage value over time—creating incentives for circulation and productive investment rather than accumulation and speculation.
-
Historical Precedents: The piece documents actual demurrage currency experiments including Depression-era local currencies, providing evidence of alternative monetary systems functioning in practice beyond theoretical proposals.
-
Digital Currency Possibilities: Noema connects historical demurrage concepts with contemporary digital currencies and programmable money, showing how technology enables implementing alternative monetary logic more feasibly than physical currencies allowed.
-
Inequality Reduction: The essay explores how demurrage could reduce wealth concentration by eliminating passive accumulation returns, showing monetary design’s relationship to economic justice beyond redistribution policies alone.
-
Circulation Incentives: Rather than moral arguments against hoarding, demurrage creates structural incentives for spending and investment, demonstrating how system design can align individual behavior with collective benefit.
Practical Applications
This framework enables monetary system reimagination:
-
Local currencies and mutual credit systems can incorporate demurrage principles when designing alternative economic tools, creating circulation incentives rather than replicating conventional money’s accumulation logic
-
Digital currency developers can explore programmable demurrage in token design, using technology to implement time-based value decay more feasibly than physical currency systems allowed
-
Economic educators can use demurrage concept to illustrate how monetary design choices shape behavior and power distribution, helping students understand money as political construction not natural phenomenon
-
Policy advocates can reference Gesell’s framework when arguing for monetary system reform, showing alternatives to conventional assumptions about currency neutrality and wealth accumulation
-
Community organizers can understand how circulation incentives could function in local economic development, imagining monetary tools serving community wellbeing rather than individual wealth maximization
Connection With SuperBenefit
-
Noema’s exploration of demurrage currency challenges SuperBenefit to interrogate token design assumptions in DAO coordination, showing how seemingly technical choices about value stability and accumulation encode political decisions about wealth distribution and power—demonstrating that coordination primitives should enable communities to experiment with diverse economic logics including circulation incentives rather than defaulting to conventional monetary mechanics that privilege holders over contributors.
-
The emphasis on how monetary design shapes behavior resonates with SuperBenefit’s understanding that coordination primitives aren’t neutral infrastructure but actively shape participation patterns and power distribution, validating the conviction that effective tools should make these political choices explicit rather than hiding them in technical implementation that appears inevitable.
-
Gesell’s framework connecting individual incentives with collective wellbeing through system design provides model for SuperBenefit’s primitive development, illustrating how coordination tools can align personal benefit with community health through structural mechanisms rather than requiring altruism or moral appeals—showing that genuinely regenerative economics emerges from designing systems where circulation and contribution generate more value than accumulation and extraction.
Related Concepts
- Sustainability - Ecological approaches to technology
- Coordination - Alternative organizing mechanisms
- Community - Digital and local organizing
- Regeneration - Restorative systems design
- Governance - Democratic technology frameworks