Sobol’s “Diagramming DAOs” analysis uses visual organizational mapping to examine Gitcoin DAO’s structure, revealing coordination patterns, workstream relationships, and governance architecture through diagrams rather than text descriptions alone. The case study demonstrates how visualization tools enable understanding complex decentralized organizations where traditional org charts fail—DAOs often have overlapping teams, fluid membership, multiple governance layers, and emergent structures that resist simple hierarchy diagrams. Sobol’s mapping approach shows contributor connections, funding flows, decision authority, and information pathways, making implicit coordination patterns explicit and surfacing potential bottlenecks or gaps. The analysis illustrates both Gitcoin’s sophisticated organizational design and the value of visual thinking for DAO participants, researchers, and designers trying to understand how decentralized coordination actually functions beyond aspirational descriptions.

Key Highlights

  • Visual Organizational Analysis: Case study demonstrates how diagrams reveal DAO coordination patterns invisible in text documentation—showing relationships between workstreams, contributor networks, governance layers, and resource flows through spatial representation.

  • Gitcoin Structure Mapping: Specific analysis of Gitcoin DAO exposes sophisticated multi-layer organization including workstreams, stewards, governance forums, and funding mechanisms, providing concrete example of mature DAO coordination architecture.

  • Beyond Hierarchy Diagrams: Sobol’s approach moves past traditional org charts inadequate for DAOs, using network visualization, role mapping, and flow diagrams to represent fluid, overlapping structures characteristic of decentralized organization.

  • Pattern Identification: Visual analysis surfaces coordination patterns including bottlenecks (excessive dependencies on particular contributors), gaps (missing connections between related workstreams), and emergent structures not captured in formal governance documentation.

  • Communication Tool: Diagrams function as shared reference for DAO members, enabling conversations about organizational design by making implicit structures explicit and discussable through visual representation.

  • Research Methodology: Case study demonstrates visual analysis as methodology for studying DAOs, showing how researchers can use mapping tools to understand organizational dynamics beyond interviews or document analysis alone.

Practical Applications

This approach enables DAO analysis and design:

  • DAOs seeking to understand their own coordination patterns can use visual mapping to identify bottlenecks, gaps, and emergent structures, making implicit organizational dynamics explicit and enabling informed redesign conversations

  • Governance designers can employ visual thinking tools when architecting DAO structures, using diagrams to explore different coordination patterns and anticipate information flows, decision pathways, and potential failure modes

  • Researchers studying decentralized organizations can adopt visualization methodologies for understanding DAO structures beyond text documentation, using network diagrams to reveal actual coordination patterns versus aspirational descriptions

  • New DAO participants can reference visual maps to understand organizational structure and orient themselves within complex coordination systems, reducing onboarding friction when text documentation alone proves overwhelming

  • Organizational consultants can use Sobol-style mapping as diagnostic tool when assessing DAO health, identifying where coordination breaks down and where structural improvements could enhance effectiveness

Connection With SuperBenefit

  • Sobol’s visual mapping methodology validates SuperBenefit’s conviction that understanding coordination requires multiple representational modes beyond text, demonstrating that diagrams reveal organizational patterns invisible in written documentation—though effective visualization should serve communities’ sense-making needs rather than primarily supporting external analysis, suggesting SuperBenefit’s primitive development might integrate visual coordination mapping as participatory practice enabling DAOs to collectively understand and deliberately shape their own structures rather than having external analysts diagram them.

  • The Gitcoin case study’s exposure of complex multi-layer DAO architecture resonates with SuperBenefit’s recognition that mature decentralized coordination involves sophisticated governance patterns beyond simple voting mechanisms, illustrating that effective coordination primitives must support various organizational scales and interacting systems rather than assuming DAOs remain simple flat structures—showing that building tools for genuine decentralization requires accommodating complexity and emergent coordination patterns that develop as communities grow and differentiate.


  • DAOs - Organizations using these platforms and tools
  • Coordination - Mechanisms for organizing work
  • Governance - Decision-making frameworks
  • Community - Networks and collaborative structures
  • Primitives - Building blocks for coordination tools